Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Blog topic for week of January 28th

In response to student requests, I'm going to start posting blog questions on the blog itself.

This weeks question was to answer either of the following:

What is the worst job you've ever had?

What are you being educated for?

I will post next week's blog question after class Thursday.

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

creative project

Who is NOT ignoring the global issues?
Despite the countless celebrities that either show no concern for all of the global issues including poverty, the AIDS problem in Africa, genocide, etc., various select celebrities have used their wealth and fame to try to make a difference. One of these celebrities is Paul Hewson, who is more commonly known as Bono from U2. Originally inspired to become a humanitarian by a benefit show staged by John Cleese and Martin Lewis for the human rights organization Amnesty International in 1979, Bono has since performed in benefit shows for Amnesty International as well, along with countless other charity projects, including the ONE campaign “to make poverty history,” of which Bono is the most recognized public supporter. Another extremely prominent humanitarian effort that Bono had a large hand in organizing was the Live 8 concerts, in which more than 1,000 musicians played throughout the world to pressure world leaders to drop the debt of the world's poorest nations, increase and improve aid, and negotiate fairer trade rules in the interest of poorer countries.
While some claim that Bono’s efforts are selfishly motivated by a desire for publicity, Bono has traveled the world to meet with various leaders including Brazilian President Lula de Silva, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin, United States Secretary of Treasury Paul H. O'Neill, and President Bush in order to put pressure on them to do their part in relieving global poverty. Additionally, Bono has attended various political and economic functions including the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in which business leaders around the world discuss the challenges of an increasingly global world economy.
The previously mentioned humanitarian endeavors are just a select few of the most renowned of Bono’s accomplishments; he has been involved in a myriad of other projects, conferences, etc. including Product Red, in which he, along with Bobby Shriver have gotten corporations such as companies such as American Express, Apple Computer, Converse, Motorola, The Gap and Giorgio Armani to agree to create products with the Product Red logo, from which a large percentage of the profits will go to raise money for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria.
As a result of his incredible efforts, Bono was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003, 2005, and 2006, and in 2005, he was named Time’s Person of the Year along with Bill and Melinda Gates.

Education

Last quarter I learned that throughout high school everyone, including myself, is taught to be good citizens. We are taught to respect and obey. Neither teachers or principles said anything about questioning authority or expressing ourselves. We were their obeyers and they were our masters.
Now that I'm in college I feel like that we can learn about ourselves without being oppressed by an authoritarian. We still have an authority, but much far more liberal than those who just seek some type of power. Since we are freer now than we were before, we can learn to be ourselves and learn to apply what were learning differently.
Now that i'm done beating around the bush, I am being educated to become myself and do what i've desired for so long: to work with animals.

education

I am being educated for a few reasons. One is just to learn for the sake of learning, expanding my intellectual horizon from exposure to ways of thinking and subjects that I normally wouldn't bother with. The other reason is to get really good at something so that I can either do it professionally, or at least be able to use the skills I learned to do something else professionally. At this point in time the former reason is most important to me.

Education?

I feel that I have been educated for different reasons. Through high school I felt that i was being educated to be a well-rounded individual. However, now that I am in college, I feel that instead of knowing a wealth of knowledge about the world, we are now looking within ourselves. We are being educated to find, know, and understand ourselves on a more intimate and a more important level then ever before.

purpose of education

I feel that I am being educated for various reasons. I am here learn about the world and my relationship to it in order to gain a sence of competence necessary for my transition into adulthood. To expose myself to life and to learn lessons that will aid me with whatever lies ahead. And finally to discover who I am to gain an understanding of how I want to contribe to society.

Odd hours opinion

Despite having worked around 15 different jobs over the last 13 years, I don't really think any job that I've had can really stand out as "the worst job." Every job had its good sides and bad. Take my current job for example: while it has some of the worst downsides I've ever encountered, it can also be incredibly fulfilling.
My current job is working at a psychiatric lockdown facility as a Mental Health Worker.
The downsides: the risk of assault, injury, infectious disease; constant exposure to harassment and inappropriate comments/behavior. I have been hit, spit on, pinched, poked, grabbed, thrown against a wall, had stuff thrown at me, been verbally abused, had to deflect extremely inappropriate sexual advances (did I mention I work with sex offenders?), and had my life threatened. Not to mention the fact that I've had to clean up everything the human body can be made to excrete (with the exception of cerebrospinal fluid, although I'm sure that will happen any day now). This was at its worst when I was working graveyard shift for 10 months (while in school). By the way, this is all for around $10/hour.
The upsides: the most obvious is that it is liquid gold for graduate school applications. In addition, it (barely) pays the bills. The less tangible rewards include being able to really help people. In this job you have the ability to make a profound difference in someone's life--whether you stop them from committing suicide, or just convince them that somebody cares. It is the most amazing feeling when someone you have been working closely with improves and is better able to manage their symptoms.
It is because of this that I do not feel that workers are entirely separated from the fruits of their labors. I think that you can reap fantastic rewards simply being of service to others (and yes, I have waitressed). While you may not be harvesting material crops, you are still breaking the cycle of isolation.

Monday, January 29, 2007

worst job ever

On top of my full time summer job, I babysit for extremely rich families who come up to enjoy Tahoe summers. Usually the kids are pretty well behaved and I get paid very well, however I have had a few horror stories. One time I had a job babysitting for six kids. An infant, 4 boys ages 2, 3, 4, and 5 and a 7 year old girl. I've babysat for five kids before, so I thought I could handle it, plus my wages for six kids make it well worth it. The kids seemed fine when I met them, but the second the parents left, they all went crazy. The baby girl literally screamed the entire night. Nothing I did could make her stop screaming. Trying to deal with a screaming baby made it hard to pay attention to four little boys jumping all over the couches and running around the house. I tried to put the baby to bed and she just screamed and cried for HOURS. Two of the boys decided to take the couch apart and use it as a trampoline, which was fun until one of them fell and started screaming as well. The other kids happily watched a movie for most of the night, but when it was time to go to bed, one of the boys was hysterical, crying that he missed his parents. I tryed to get him to calm down for about an hour. FINALLY the parents came home and dealt with their kids. I was so happy to just get my money and get out of there. However, when I got to the car, I saw that they underpaid me by a huge amount! By that time I just wanted to get out of there, so I didn't say anything, but when they called me again for a job, I made sure to say no.

What are you being educated for?

I feel that I am being educated to find out how the world works. This has not always been the case, but in my later years of high school, and now in college, I feel that this is the main reason I am here. The other reasons are there; parents want me to go, get a job and live in the world, all those outside things, but recently it is simply to understand more of our society. Not only do I want to be educated about the world, but I want to change it, and I figure the best way to do that is to first know about it.

worst job EVER?

Well I can't exactly call it my worst job as if I am comparing it to others due to the fact that I never had another income other than my skimpy Jamba Juice checks. Having worked there for about a year, I think that I got a pretty good feel for what the company was about, how it was run, and the type of people that portrayed the ideal jamba leader image. Customer service is the worst type of job there is, hands down...I'm convinced. A year of screeching blenders, non slip shoes, and having to deal with freakin' ridiculously stupid customers and orders is enough to scare any teenage boy into striving for a university education and a future job that pays more than $10 bucks an hour. It was for me. Having read Ehrenreich's article tonight, I couldn't find anything more fitting to this week's prompt. In my time at yamba yuce did encounter many people that greatly surpassed my meak 16 years of age doing the same work as I did. For many, money is hard to come by and no form of work rests beneath them. I hope to avoid a career in customer service and/or food when I'm out and working, but I can say that I am experienced in the field. Food for thought I guess. While I may have bitched and moaned my way through that year, it did provide me with an unforgettable introduction into the world of working for wages. I'm sure that everyone in the world has a horror story to tell about their first job. Maybe thats just how life is. Maybe not.

The worst Job ever

I am a very big theatre person and I went to and event for my high school that was a discussion about different shows. While there I met this woman who ran the program and her and I hit it off really well. She started talking to me about how she needed some office help at her home because she could not do it herself (she was handicapped). So I went to her house and she started showing me around and she made me read this odd biography about herself...then she said that she would be paying me $5.25 and she said it like it was such a good thing...but the lady really needed the help so I looked passed how cheap she was. I then started working and she would assign one task and then another in the middle of that one and everything just overlapped. After that she would get really frustrated and yell at me about how she had deadlines!!! So I began to get really irritated. Also, she would ask me when I could work and I would tell her and then she would let me leave 1-2 hours later. She also had this illegal indian woman working for her and she would mistreat her and give her checks that would bounce...it was so sad. One day I just got so fed up with the lady that I went to her house and said it to her face that I couldn't stand her and I quit. She said that she would send my check to me but didn't so 2 weeks later I went to her house and said that I needed my check.

What I'm being educated for

There are different fields in which we are educated in and they all teach us something that will be helpful in life in some form or another. We are educated to help us grow into who we wish to be are and help us choose what are calling maybe, what we eventually want to do with out lives. Education gives us a better understanding of the world around us. So that ultimately we can make the right decisions for ourselves. But education is not only a benefit to us as individuals but also the entire human race. With a better education we have a better understanding of other cultures, types of people and what they have been through so that we can help others and have a understand the type of the world we live in. education enables us to become more aware and to think things more complexly. The world is not black and white and this is something we need to know. Being educated helps us have the skills necessary for us to exist in life.

What I'm being educated for

There are different fields in which we are educated in and they all teach us something that will be helpful in life in some form or another. We are educated to help us grow into who we wish to be are and help us choose what are calling maybe, what we eventually want to do with out lives. Education gives us a better understanding of the world around us. So that ultimately we can make the right decisions for ourselves. But education is not only a benefit to us as individuals but also the entire human race. With a better education we have a better understanding of other cultures, types of people and what they have been through so that we can help others and have a understand the type of the world we live in. education enables us to become more aware and to think things more complexly. The world is not black and white and this is something we need to know. Being educated helps us have the skills necessary for us to exist in life.

"education"

I would like to think that I am being educated so that I can help people. Make bank and help people. How? who knows. Seems like coming up with the "next great idea" would suffice. I am taking all these damn environmental science classes... maybe i will create a new form of acquiring energy that wont poison our planet. How does learning about what we are doing wrong (basically all that they teach) help us? Maybe those who believe will conserve the resources they use a little more, but that is not a solution. No matter how much an American pretends to conserve their resources, they are still hella times more harmful to the environment than anyone else around the globe, minus China. I need to be learning shit about light and harnessing its power. But who wants to take all those damn science courses? The solution: become an astronomer?

Kyle Edmonds

Imagine yourself in 20yrs

In 20 yrs I imagine myself working in the police force as a homicide detective. With a family,a big house with enough land to have a bunch of animals, and to travel and party no matter how old I get. I want to attain anything that I desire not having to worry about money. After reading chapter 5&6 I got the feeling that things can really go wrong or life can take a sharp turn and give you something else in return.Frankenstein was so ambitious with his education in the beginning,but as circumstances changed his life took a different meaning.His ambition towards education turned into revenge. Happiness can be taken away in a instance....if u believe in god I guess u can say god has a plan for everyone. If u don't then I would say u choose to be the way you are or u choose to go through that hard path like, Sartre would say.

education

Since coming to Santa Cruz, I've realized that my high school counselors weren't feeding me bullshit the ENTIRE time-- an education is not just a piece of paper signifying that you're certified to work in grown-up-job-land, it's something that in general increases your ability to function in life. It helps you look at things critically and gives you the tools to educate yourself once your formal education is done. I want my education so that I can go through life understanding the world around me, instead of just going through the motions until I die.

What am I being educated for?

Hmm... I am being educated so I can have understand how things work to this day. Things like why are we here, what's our past, how can we solve things kind of things. Personally, I like to be inform about things that interest me like history. Yes, history is fascinating to me. I think being educated or have some kind of education is important because it can get you anywhere in the long wrong. Not many people can appreciate at one point but will regret it in the future. My parents would always tell me going to school is important because it can get me some kind of decent job some day. Part of me is in school because I want to have a future. Part of me is in school because I want to learn more for the heck of it. So having an education is beneficial to me.

Karaoke Terror

I would say that being paid $10 dollars an hour at a summer camp in beautiful northern California is a pretty wonderful occupation, something that only a few lucky teens can score. There were, however, elements of the job that drove me insane. When I would be assigned a non-stop 3 hour shift in the "Karaoke" room, things got gloomy. First of all, being a musician who does not feel a lot of compassion for pop/rock bullshit, I had a hard time listening to the same rendition of a Hilary Duff song over and over. The few young male campers who were brave enough to sing in front of their female counterparts usually chose a song by Coldplay, one of the lamest "bands" ever to walk on the planet. On top of listening to awful singing of silly pop songs, one also had to deal with the strange situation regarding girls ages (9-13) who wanted to sit on your lap, give you a hug, or sometimes even smack your ass. This was a very awkward situation because you can't just push little people off of your leg onto the floor, you have deal with it smoothly and as nicely as possible. I plan to go back next summer, hopefully as a drawing or ceremaics "specialist," in order to minimize the perils of Coldplays shitty guitar riffs, three re-cylced chords, and mediocre pop vocals.

I have an opinion

Education in modern society is as much for reasons of curiosity as it is for self advancement. You may educate yourself because you are interested and want to KNOW, but the state educates you so that you can function more efficiently within society and thus more easily advance yourself.
Right now in my life I am going to school for a variety of reasons, but three stand out: I am really, really interested and I feel that my chances of both changing the world for the better and making money for myself increase the more I know. The more awards/degrees I hold the more other members of our society will recognize my claim to an opinion as legitimate and hopefully they will respect my opinion. I have opinions about the way things should be and I want people to listen to them, so I need to not only sound like I know what I'm talking about but I need to be able to point to my past and say: look, look at all the things I've dealt with and learned from, surely I know what I'm talking about. This is why I am educating myself. Yeah.

worst job/education

I don't think I have really had a bad job so far. I could say that one of the worst was babysitting for horrible children that are almost impossible to keep control of. I have had many of those experiences. Although the children were terrible, the money was usually worth it, so I dealt with it. The reason that I would say that I am being educated is to first of all get a good job once I am done with college. Second I want to learn more about the things that I am interested to see what I want to do with the rest of my life.

Worst Job/Educated

I've never had a really bad job yet, some of my jobs were tougher than others, but nothing bad. I am being educated so I can get a job, because without a degree from college it is a lot tougher to get a good job that pays well. I am also being educated because thats what most people do and I've been brought up by parents who encourage going to college, so I went.

What I am being educated for

Is I typ this, I am being educated. I am paying money , to typ this blog. I am paying a large sum of moeny to the university of californea, with the hopes that after 4 years they will give me a peace of paper as proff of my education. But what is the purpose of this alledged "education". The purpose is many fold. To fullfill the expectations of my parents, to be able to make a living for me self in the futer, to expand my horizens, intellectaly. However that real reason, is to do my part to make this county a better place. You cant instatude change with out this "education", that is so highly prized in our society.THE END

The Worst Job I Ever Had

The worst job I ever had was my job as a soliciter for Enviroment Califonea. My day began at 12, and ended at 10. I would be driven to forien, and exiting nehboorhoods, where i would then pester the residents about the enviroment. I felt like shit anoying all the people, and felt like hsit couse the houres were shity, and I felt like shit couse i got fired after a week, but it worked out because then I got a job at Jamba Juice, wear i drank juice all day.

P.A.

I was a personal assistant to a type-A lawyer. Hours: 8-6. Pay: $16/hour.

I got coffee, made trial notebooks, called clients, picked up clients, filed subpoenas, took in dry cleaning, answered phones (so many phones), ordered office supplies, carried his medication around (in case he had another heart attack), called his wife to tell her he would be late (again), made reservations for dinner, waited in line for Harry Potter tickets, bought birthday presents for his employees, got more coffee, fired his receptionist, carried evidence to court, babysat his client's children while they were in court, managed his calendar, and drove him to the hospital.

He had another heart attack.

Which is why I quit and why I will never be a personal assistant for anyone. Ever. Even if I did make BANK.

My Job

Jobs. Wow, who hasn't had one? Well, fortunately for me, I have only had three jobs, and they were great. My first job was working at a custom built computer store, where I was assigned to be a Beta Tester and Computer Customizer. Every Monday and Wednesday I was given a new piece of software to test and write a review on. I was given everything from basic execution programs to amazing hi-def games. Then on Tuesday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday (when applicable) I was testing hardware and customizing computers for customers. This was a pretty kick ass job.
My second job was at a recording studio in Sacramento. Here I was hired as a small tech for recording. I did the basics, which was set levels and run multiple tracks for a wide range of sounds. Then the owner Danny took me under his wing and trained me a lot more in sound engineering. Some of the bands I got to record were Tsunami Bomb, Story of the Year, Die Trying, The Used, The Ataris, The Starting Line and a few more. It was such a fun job, but it was time consuming.

My third job is my band. Yes it is a job because there is a lot of work to do and it is very demanding. Over break we were in Las Vegas doing Battle of the Bands, which was ALOT of work. But I must say, this is my favorite job of all, because at the end of the day, it feels rewarding and phenomenal.

My Ed

I was always told that education is the key to success and that it creates better opportunities in life. To me, the education I have received/am receiving is very valuable. Without it, I would be nothing. I have been an amazing gift and I am trying my absolute hardest to not put it to waste. To many, my education may seem worthless, or "not good enough for a high paying job" but for me, it’s more than enough to help me understand this world and its people. When I succeed here at UCSC, the education given to me here will greatly help me move on to my ultimate goal, but until then, I have to take advantage of everything given to me and keep pushing forward.
So I guess to answer the question, I am being educated in order to change what others have fucked up.

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Education

What are we being educated for?
Man, what a question; sometimes i wonder that myself when I'm sitting in my half a room, reading endless pages, trying to comprehend (i guess) a single idea which has long since eluded me. Whats the point of all this? To be well read? That would seem to be the most, for lack of a better word, honorable, reason. But then i suppose its not really that is it? No, sadly it seems like the whole point is to get a good job, right? That's why we do this, for a better job. Well that just depresses me. Fuck that, the way i see it here's the point of being educated: 1. become well read/gain life experience 2. learn what you enjoy and what you don't 3. take that to do what you enjoy the most.

don't use it just to make money. money comes and goes, life doesn't (well, in this sense it doesn't) so get a degree in whatever you fucking want and dont worry about how much it pays in the long run.

Cheers,

Nick


It's been a long day, breaking my back for pay
It's been a long day, working my life away
it's been a long day, sucking my ego in
It's been a long day, and it's just begun

It's been a long day

Worst Job Ever

I currently have a job cleaning our UCSC parking lots. It isn't exactly a job filled with dignity, walking around with a bucket picking up trash for three hours on foot. It's pretty lonely too, as I'm alone, walking from lot to lot picking up trash, mostly just cigarette butts. Maybe it wouldn't be so bad if I had some music to listen to but my ipod just broke. Anyway, it's a job with no challenge or difficulty, just boredom and loneliness.
Travis

Education

We are educated so that we can acquire jobs that provide enough financial support so we can live relatively easy lives. The education that we acquire is also a way to make each generation more capable of creating better societies and expanding on issues that previous generations were incapable of addressing to solve or improve on. And then there is the simple answer to why we are educated which is so we do not appear to be complete dumb-shits when we attempt to have intelligent or just plan witty conversations with one another. Then again, maybe being educated is just to make us feel good.

die worken schizer

That title's probably not grammatical (anyone speak German on this blog?)...

I've had so very many shit jobs, but two stand out in memory. Back when I was a lowly hod carrier on a masonry crew, there was a piling that had to be poured for a stone column we were installing, but the architect wouldn't ok the layout, so the hole we dug just that there. The engineer said we had to keep the hole dry, or else the soil conditions would change and we wouldn't be able to pore it without analyzing another sample. So, every morning around 6:30am for two weeks, in the widdle of a rainy and cold winter, I had to climb into this hole with a sponge and sop up the standing water. Beyond being frigid and uncomfortable, it was just demeaning. I was really happy the day we poured those fucking pilings. I think I got paid $15/hr. for that.

The second was temping in Scott's Valley one Winter break for a "tech company". I say tech company in quotes because it was about the lowest-tech operation imaginable. They made magnetic strips, which were components for mother boards (or some shit like that). One of their clients had found a bunch of duds in a shipment, so they put out a call to temp agencices to get people to test these strips with some kind of osciloscope. Me and two other temps would sit there with this radio-wave-emitting doo-hickey between our legs and pass thousands of these strips over it, while looking at what I swear was an Atari video game monitor for either a "0" or a "1" (I don't even remember which indicated what). That job was ricoculous, and I'm fairly sure the test wasn't actually detecting anything, because I could pass the same strip over the scope twice and get two different results. I think I got paid $10/hr. for that.

Friday, January 26, 2007

Worst job ever

HELLO!!! Is what I would say as people rushed into Jamba Juice.It was not a horrible job ,but I had to act very perky and force a smile ,seriously I have wrinkles from forcing a smile on my face tell me who's gonna pay for my Botox who? I loved the smoothies that they had imagine drinking all the smoothies u want during the day...not bad. I was a waitress at all these fancy conventions I found out that PS3 was gonna come out before anyone did.I spilled wine on a guys suit it was embarrising, but funny.

Thursday, January 25, 2007

worst job i ever had

the worst job i ever had was waitressing. although i made a lot of money, it wasn't even close to worth it - i would leave work every day in a bad mood because of both co-workers and because of the customers. it amazed me to see the sense of entitlement that some people seem to have when they go out to eat - like they are entitled to be nasty to the waitress because they are paying. however, i met a lot of interesting people through waitressing, and i also learned that i want to do something with my life so that i don't end up stuck in a waitressing job that makes me miserable.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Achebe's Problems

Achebe has definitely created a character affected by Change. As soon as Okonkwo becomes stable and happy in his life, things begin to change, and he begins to lose his livelihood. Not to be cliche, but things start to fall apart. And it sucks. And that's what change is all about. Not knowing what will happen next, or whether it will make things better or worse. In a moment our whole lives and everything we count on can be torn from us, and Okonkwo exemplifies this.

I believe that Okonkwo is much like Frankenstein's monster. Like Shelley's character, his first kill is not meant as a kill, but rather a display of strength. Both slay young boys, and are outcast from society because of it. In the lives of both characters, this signifies the descent of "normal" life. Also, Okonkwo's life is upturned by the arrival of the white men, who try to "civilize" his culture. The white men in this story parallel Victor Frankenstein in that by screwing with the world they think they are doing good, when really they are just messing things up.

I believe both Okonkwo and the monster to be unfortunate in how their lives were altered by the societies they were a part of.

characters/setting/achebe's monster

1) The characters of my problem would just be me because I am the one trying to figure out what I want to do with the rest of my life. It is something that I must figure out for myself and no one else can decide it for me. I guess the setting would be where I live, here at UCSC and back at my hometown.

2) I think that Achebe's monster in his novel would be the laws that are imposed on the Nigerians and I also think that Okonkwo is a monster in himself. When the white men come to take over the people of Nigeria and set up churches and their government and try to convert them they are breaking apart everything that had been there before. Families and friends were torn apart because of new views imposed by the white men. I also think that many of the things that happened to Okonkwo were because of his own actions. He was so filled with anger and so focused on not being anything like his father that he wouldnt allow himself to show any compassion towards anyone. He even killed his "son" Ikemefuna because of he was worried that others would see him as a coward if he didnt. In the end, everything in Okonkwo's life fell apart, partly because of his actions and partly because of the white men who came to take over.

Where is my problem / Things Fall Apart

I have now reached a place where I can not turn back and the past is beyond my reach. To try to change the things done in the past is my problem.

In Things Fall Apart, there is no monster. The people live according to their customs, but not everything is perfect. (nothing/no one will ever be perfect) Yes there are problems due to the fact of English Colonialism, but they do not qualify to be called "monsters" These things happen, that's the way life is/was/will be. As human beings, we do not know any better. Trying to fix the things we think are broken or need fixing, is what we do. In other words, sticking our noses into other people's business is our specialty, as human beings.

setting of my problem/ achebe/ rousseau

The characters of my problems would be me. My inability to make my own decisions was a part of me since I was a kid. Well, I'm mostly afraid of making the wrong choices because I hate being wrong. So I mostly let others (mostly my sister since I adore her so much) do the decision making for me.

okay, so. after reading the book, i assume the monster would be the white men. you know, they try to convert people (which they did), take over land, disregards people's beliefs and all that good stuff.

for some reason, i couldn't relate rousseau's savage to the book. even though i think it's the white men that are monsters, these white men have their society unlike rousseau's savage. Rousseau's savage is a person that is alone and without society so this puzzles me.

Elizabeth

Achebebebebebebebebebe

Thanks Dillon, the link works



A) The characters and setting of my problem involve myself or a character representing myself. The setting would be a cross between his life at home playing music and the other being his college campus.

B)There are multitude of possibilities that Achebe's monster could embody and even more that could be interpreted and discovered from these. From my reading, the most subtle yet vicious monster appears as the burden of shame Okonkwo's father leaves upon his psyche. Okonkwo fears appearing weak to others as his father did, and will go to great lengths to appear strong and self supporting, never needing the aid of others in a warrior sense as well as his farm/harvest pride. This 'monster' or fear of weakness that Okonkwo has harbored is one greater than the concept of a physical monster such as the white man in the novel, but instead is a mental ghoul that cannot be avoided only battled from within.

C) In relation to the monster I described above, Rousseau's concept of man seems to be validated. Okonkwo's monster results from his fear of appearing weak to the society he inhabits. In turn, his fear and weakness stem from the concept that there is a society surrounding him that he must prove himself to. Rousseau would ponder the fact that had Okonkwo never encountered the societal burdens left upon him by his father, this 'monster', ultimately growing from his tribe's expectations would have never corrupted him into acting in the way he does.

Achebe's monster

The characters of my problem are me and the setting of my problem is on this world. I am struggling to find what I want to do with my life, so it’s pretty much self explanatory.
Achebe's monster I think is Okonkwo, because he builds himself up to be a strong person to avoid being similar to his father who is lazy and not respected by the community. Okonkwo wants to change his family’s reputation and by doing so he becomes so arrogant and over dominant that it leads to his downfall. Okonkwo became a monster to avoid becoming anything like his father. Rosseau’s savage is a person who is unchanged by society and has not been influenced in any way by society. Rosseau's savage is not illustrated in Achebe's book. The characters in Achebe's book are in a society and are affected by that society. The only way Rosseau's savage would fit in here is if Rousseau's savage was referring to people who don't assimilate to western culture.

creative assignment question

I feel that, since I carry my problem around with me, the setting of my problem is where I live and the places I go. Since my problem (that I don't face my problems) is rather general, it can be applied to many things such as schoolwork, relationships, parents. So I guess the main characters would be me (duh), my boyfriend (who can either be the cause of or the solution to a problem I'm facing), my parents and teachers and anyone else on the other side of my problems.

monster&achebe

After reading Things Fall Apart, my first reaction was to immediately label the white missionaries as Achebe's "monster." After all, they came to the Ibo village uninvited, preaching that their ideas were right and averyone else was a sinner condemned to an eternity in hell. They imposed their point of view and their law system on a village when they had absolutely no business trying to change the Ibos' way of life. Ultimately, they caused the destruction of a very traditional society with their simple, narrow-minded ignorance and intolerance. Even the village, while they did not agree with the white man's ideas, grudgingly gave them a piece of land and would have let them live in peace if they had minded their own business. However, my original definition of "monster" was a creature who was misunderstood by society and chose to lash out at it, and this definition seems to fit Okonkwo better. Although he is accepted and even honored in his society, he has a difficult time making everyone around him understand his feelings, and this makes him even angrier and he lashes out as much as he can. Almost like Rousseau's idea that society made his innocent savage evil, the changing society that Okonkwo is faced with makes him uncontrollably violent.

m

1) I totally didn't do the first question about my problem last week, so I'll describe my problem now. My problem is my inability to form attachments to people. Wherever I go I make friends that only last as long as I am with them. As soon elementary school, middle school and high school ended, the people that didn't go on with me became totally irrelevant. I spent my junior year of high school at a boarding school in Italy. I didn't miss my family or my friends from home, and when I came back all I missed about Rome was the city itself, not any of the people I met. This is a problem because there is no one that I've known long enough, besides mabye my family, that has been around me long enough to really trust them. The people I've made friends with at UCSC I hesitate to really bond with because I know that eventually that bond may mean more to them than me. This makes me feel like a selfish person, but I can't really help it.

The setting of my problem is wherever I am, and the characters are myself, my family, and my past present and future friends.

2)
a. In Things Fall Apart the monster is peoples need to dominate and control other people. This is embodied not only by the British but by the clan and Okwonko as well. It is easy to say that the monster is imperialism, the force that conquered much of the world on ridiculous pretenses, only to abolish or disfigure millenia old cultures, and eventually throw much of the conquered regions into chaos. It is more than that however. The monster is not just the imperial force that came in and took over. It is also the inflexibility of the native culture that aids in its downfall, and that drives Okwonko to commit suicide. Okwonko was everything that his culture admired. He is strong, wealthy, and manly, with many wives, children, and farms. Okwonko embodies the values of the clan, and the weakness of the clan. Agression and unflinching knowledge that one way is the only way is the real monster. Achebe would not have spent half the book only mentioning white men once if they were the only problem.
b. The Ibo in the book are nothing like Rousseau's savages. We already know that Rousseau's savage was an unfair and unrealistic view of prehistoric man, but Achebe adds even more assurance. Okwonko's clan in the book is past the point where they qualifiy as savages even by Rouseeau's standards. They have culture, traditions, and deep connections.

Characters, Setting, and Achebe's Monster

After some time to think about my problem I have decided to modify it somewhat. I am sure this is not the last time I will do this since every day I am hopefully gaining knowledge and new prespectives that help me see problems in a new light. So my revised proposal is the problem of living in the here and now. I have been stuggling with this since I came into drama class freshman year of highschool, but I also believe that many problems across our world are caused by people who are not concentrating on the here and now. The setting for my problem is fluid and constantly changing, no matter what you want to believe. I am not sure yet who I want to focus on for my character. I need some more time to explore this new idea.

Achebe's monster can generally be seen as colonization, but more specifically his monster is the imposing foreign culture that tears up the traditional life he is used to. In the case of Nigeria the British are the people that have become monsters, but any culture that imposes their beliefs on a foreign culture without understanding it and aims to subordnate other people's beliefs can play the monster.

Rousseau presents the savage like a simple being without society, structure, and attachment. The people of Nigeria ovbiously do not fit this mold because they had very complex traditions, culture, and social network. However colonization does illistrate that societies imposed upon people do not function because the people do not know how to live in them and make them function.

Problem & Achebe

The characters in my problem are basically most of my family, but especially my dad. The setting is all of my life.

The monster in Achebe are the people in general who went to Africa and destroyed an unchanging tribe. Before they arrived they had their own culture and their own traditions. Their uniqueness (if that's even a word) was then destroyed along with a few members and their culture was soon replaced. The monster might have came around due to their curiosity. Their way of life was completly different from eachothers and so the people with the stronger arms, destroyed the other. This story can relate to Pratt's claim "Kill the man, save the Indian."
Achebe doesn't really confirm Rousseau's idea of a savage because Rousseau describes his savage to live a simple life and not desiring too much, but the tribe is similar to a community and they have more desires, wants and need than Rousseaus description.

Characters and setting of my problem/ Achebe

For my problem, the only character is me since 1) it is my problem and 2) it is my life. The setting for my problem is the world in which i live in, so right now it would UCSC, but in 4 or 5 years the setting could change to whatever i do next with my life.

Achebe:
In Things Fall Apart, the missionaries that come to Africa and try to convert the people to Christianity are the monsters. The monster is brought about because even though they think they are doing the right thing by forcing another , and in their minds, a better religion on people who don't want a new religion or a new way of thinking. After reading Achebe, Rousseau's savage does not really make sense to me anymore. Even though the people of the small African village, to Rousseau and other would have been seen as savages, they aren't. They are like everyday people, trying to feed their families, and teach their children good values, and just simply survive, which doesn't make them savages.
1) Characters and setting of my problem. My problem is greed, so the characters would be those who have greed and those who are affected by greed. I want to cover governments and their officials, the current one in U.S. and any other current and past ones which I find I want to research/discuss more. I also want to discuss corporations that cause mass harm with their greed, like Procter & Gamble. I want to discuss the problems/issues that greed has caused, but only to a certain extent. I also want to figure out exactly what greed is, what it stems from, and how to curb it. So, then, my setting will be more of a philosophical one. I will show that greed causes problems, I will focus on the problems that I find particularly harmful, and then I will discuss the origins of greed and possible solutions to the problems it has caused. Sound good?
2) a) Achebe's monster could be aggression. Many of the undesirable things that happen in his story are caused by someones aggression: the aggression of Okonkwo causes him to be abusive to his family as well as leads to his own death (from his overeagerness for war); the aggressive tactics of the second priest lead to confrontations between his church and the clan; the aggressiveness of the District Commissioner and his superiors in his homeland lead to the destruction of the clan. I think, in all these cases, the cause for aggression is greed. In Okonkwo's case it is fear of being thought weak, a fear that stems from his desire, his greed, to be a lord of the clan. The priest is greedy in a weird spiritual way: greedy to gather followers and conquer those who will not follow. And the imperialism that causes the aggressiveness of the D.C. and his Queen is most certainly caused by greed: the desire to possess more, more gold, more slaves, more land, more trade, more converts. More, more, more.
b) Achebe's book describes a society that we could consider to be a precursor to our own. In a way, then, Achebe confirms Rousseau's picture of how society evolved: the clan Achebe describes is at a late stage of Rousseau's savage: when property, agriculture, love, war, and "title" are developed. However, I don't think that Achebe's book does much to confirm or dis confirm the earlier stages of Rousseau's savage. In fact, I don't really think that Achebe's book really matters in terms of confirming the accuracy of the savage in Rousseau's historical narrative. It does, however, serve as evidence that society does change over time, in fact, one society can take over another. This confirms a major point of Rousseau's work: that society changes not through divine will or natural law, but through human actions. Thus, if, perhaps, the characters of Achebe's book had acted differently than the path of their history could have been changed. But, maybe not. Maybe history really is a natural force that we have no control over. I prefer to think that we have control, and as such I can try to save the world. Really.

Blog Entry: 1/23/07

1. The characters/setting of my problem.

I am the character in my problem, as im sure are most of you for your own problems. The setting is irrelevent in the way that I could go anywhere, but at the same time, it defines my problem entirely. My problem is solving whatever conflict that may surround me. So in a sense, I am the setting of my problem as well. It is difficult for me to focus my attention to where I am not present. Currently, I could say that my problem lies within the confines of this campus. I have chosen to be here, and now I must figure out how I can take advantage of my situation to the fullest. I want to seek out and USE the resources that surround me, but what is it that i want to seek out, or to accomplish? Meeting people, making friends is not the focus of my attention. It is more of a by product of my being... I want knowledge, opportunity, and meeting the right people is definitely part of that process. I am not sure how vital a part it is at this stage, but I am assuming that if I am motivated, opportunities to meet the right people will occur naturally. This brings me back to the core of my problem: What motivates me? What do I want to accomplish in this lifetime?

2. Achebe

a) The monster in Achebe, from his point of view, is definitely the missionaries that arrive and impose their religion onto the people of Umuofia. I was impressed by the lecturer's comment on the impact of European culture on the rest of the world. They conquored the globe... pretty much. That is a pretty monstorous task. If you think about it today, who has tried that recently? Hitler, and what do you think of when you hear his name? We should be ashamed for destroying the cultural diversity that once inhabited the earth.

b) The people of Umuofia were not savages according to Rousseau. They were an organized people with villages, tradition, and ceremonies. According to Rousseau, the savage man is alone, and does not have "culture". He is a savage that lives off of the plentiful land and that is it. He exists to survive and nothing more. Perhaps Rousseau viewed these Africans as savages, and if he did, he was just a naive spectator who had no interest in looking any deeper. These people, without any industrial revolution to stimulate a massive growth, lived "simple" lives with "simple" tools. By "simple" i mean individually manufactored or produced. Every man in their culture had the ability to create a plentiful life from scratch. All it took was hard work and dedication. One was not lesser because of their low income or low status in society.
The characters in the setting of my problem would be everyone that surrounds me and espeacilly myself. I have to learn how to manage my life and start putting things in perspective and not worry to much about the future let things happen.

Achebe's monster I would say are the colonial men that started to put up missions and started to turn his country upside down. The monster is created by foriegn people who try and put thier rules and beliefs on people who did not ask to be colonized in the first place. All they leave behind is a giant hole in thier society and confusion is all they actually accomplish. In Things Fall Apart the savage to me were the people that set up the Missions, becuase they told the people that thier beliefs were savage ,but what is right in this world anyways.

Monday, January 22, 2007

Problem and Achebe

1)The setting for my problem is anywhere that I might happen to be. The characters can be any sort of authority figure in my life or just in general. These used to be my parents, but now their direct influence has virtually vanished. In terms of my actual problem, I think that I have a general propensity towards honesty and not so much a problem with bad lying. This probably comes from my dad, as he's the most honest person I know, even though he's a lawyer.

2)a.The Monster in Achebe's novel is the imperialization and the changes imposed on Okonkwo's natural way of life, by the white man. What brought this about was the greed and selfishness of one people. There was also the unrealistic thought of whites that they were somehow superior to others and their way of life was right, and therefore it was their duty to "correct" others ways of living.
b.In terms of Rousseau's savage, it seems that Okonkwo meets the definition. Rousseau seems to idolize this modern natural man that is seen through his eyes as savage. Rousseau thinks that this type of man is able to live a much simpler life, even if he got the idea of communities wrong. Okonkwo is certainly able to live a simpler life, technologically speaking, but in terms of social relations and, it was not so much easier, so here Rousseau's ideas are flawed. But we still see that these communities have not led to the destruction of one another. It is only once modern white communities come and impose there way of life does everything fall out of order. All the tribes and people Okonkwo knew were able to get along, and there were rules, and no wars happened without a just cause, and no land was taken from anyone else. Life was fair and simple according to the majority(of elders and the powerful). Rousseau was basically right in terms of how his savage man lived at peace with one another.

Problem/achebe

The problem is one of motivation that lies within me and is up to me to correct as I figure out my place in the world. The setting is here in UCSC where I hope to gain this improved understanding.

The monster is the white men and their lack of understanding and respect for the people of Africa and their ways of life. To the white men they are simply savages, or monsters if you will, as opposed to human beings. The belief of their supieriority and manifest destiny is the monster that leads to the collapse of their lifestyle.

Character & Setting/ Achebe

1) The Characters in my problem are probably myself and the people i interact with, the people i meet that may have an effect on how i view the world or people in general. But, the main character is myself. My probelm is very personal to me. I have control over who i choose to become. although i may meet people through out my life that will affect my beliefs, in the end i am responsible for myself. if i want to do something or be something, i am fully capable of making it happen. the Setting of my problem really could be anywhere i go, anyplace where something significant may happen to alter my point of view.

2a) The monster in Achebe is probably the white colonizers. I may not completely agree with everything in Okonkwo's culture but it is still his own as well as the rest of the people in his tribe. All cultures have aspects of them that may be seen as strange or even wrong to others but this does not make it ok for any one group to try and change another, thinking their way is the "best". culture is something that is passed down and is apart of ones idetitly. For the people of tribe to lose this culture is the same thing as losing themsleves, forgetting everything that makes them who they are and just succuming to what ever the colonizers put on them.
2b) Achebe does not confirm Rousseau's Savage. Rousseau explains his savage as man in his natural state. his savage is simple, with no hidden agendas. just simple desires and needs. Also Rousseau's savage is man alone, how he would act if there was no real society to poison him. In "things fall apart" there is still a society that affects the people within it. Okonkwo and the other Characters are all very much apart of their community. This feeling of community does make each person better as well as worse.

Problem continued../Achebe

The characters in my problem are the students in my classes as well as future students or people that I may meet. My problem takes place mostly at school, but does travel throughout California a bit.

The monster in Achebe is his father who he Okonkwo believes to be weak. Relating weakness to his father, weak is something that he refuses to be. The amount of wives and children that he has proves that he is not weak and supports a big family. Seeing that is son his weak he is hard on him and the book states that he beats his son causing him to be a "sad-faced youth" (14). I believe that Achebe reinforces Rousseau's "savage" because it is based on human nature and Achebe's monster was brought about by himself and how soceity forced him to view his life.

Part 2 of problem/Achebe's monster

The characters in my setting are primarily my parents. They are the two people that I try to please the most. The setting is wherever I am faced with my problem. As of now, the setting is college.

I believe that man is Achebe’s monster. It becomes clear that the white men are the more focused of the monsters, but I believe that all humans are the monsters. The fact that man’s pride and selfish ambition is a large factor in his judgments and decisions is what effectively brings his downfall because he uses idea curtains such as racism to separate himself from others.
After Achebe, I think that Rousseau’s savage remains the same. It appeared to me that the savage was man in his natural state and was therefore lessened to disharmony than man was in the state of society. Achebe reinforces the idea that man is put into further struggle and harm when confronted with man's idea of uniformity through society.

Problem/Achebe

Describe the characters and setting of your problem.

The characters involved with my problem deal with a couple groups of people. The main character is the corporation, and I am going to group all corporations together as one for the sake of my argument. These corporations are the figure-head for money in our society, and all the people involved with them are usually people who lust after large amounts of money, and forget about the morality of being human. They are the main character, but another character is the people who get screwed by them, the poor and more underdeveloped cultures. These are the victims. The last character, which is a large one, is the consumer. That is us, and all the middle-class; non third world buyers who continue to fund the corporations.
The setting of my problem is the entire globe, and it generally rests in the field of economics. The problems rest within the banks and stock exchanges of the world, and the earth that we live on. It is also in our minds, that we must buy and we must have things to make us happy. This level of the problem is entirely within our mind, and within society, because it is society that puts it in our mind.


A)Who/what is the monster in Achebe? What brought the monster about?

I believe that the monster in Achebe’s book is the white man. There are horrific things done within the tribes before whites arrive, but at least they are to their own code and culture. The thing that is so monstrous about the white man in this book is that he destroys not only physical people, but a culture as well. He destroys ideas that were completely innovative and original, about how the world works and what we should do about it, and replaces it with his own. The slaughter of a person is one thing, but the killing of what people stand for, destroying their beliefs, is much worse.
The monster came about because of differing ideas. The white man saw these people as uncivilized “savages” and decided to “help” them, or “save” them. They also had natural resources, actually the people themselves were a natural resource, and so to loot and conquer was the main reason the monster was there. The more philosophical reason I believe is that the white man is there to destroy what he does not know. We are naturally afraid of the unknown, and since we have the power to change or kill that unknown, we do it. This part of the world scared whites, and so we took it upon ourselves to get rid of it.

B)After Achebe, what do we make of Rousseau’s “savage.”

I think that Achebe does not confirm Rousseau’s idea of a savage, because his “savages” are not alone. They are in groups, and have a community, and can recognize things. However I think that Achebe’s people are more than the natural man, they have evolved to a certain degree civilization, even if it is different than ours. With this in mind, it is hard to compare the African community in Things Fall Apart to Rousseau’s image of a savage, because I feel that the Africans are almost more of a civilized man than a natural man.

problems/Achebe

1. Describe the characters and setting of your problem.
My problem was procrastination so the character/s in my problem is me. The setting can really be anywhere, but it's usually just me sitting in my room all night before a paper is due trying to pump it out.

2. a) Who/what is the monster in Achebe? What brought the monster about?
I would have to say that the moster inAchebe would have to be the imperialists who go to Africa. They go there, upset native life, tell them everything they've ever done was wrong, and try to change their religion. They really don't care about the native's feeling s about this, though. They only care about what they want. They just completely destroy the only way of life the natives have ever known.

2. b) After Achebe, what do we make of Rousseau's "savage"?

Achebe's idea of a "savage" does not confirm Rousseau's idea of a "savage" mainly because the "savages" in Things Fall Apart live in communities. They do not live isolated like the "savage" in Roussaeu's. Not only that but the Africans are more civilized than the natural man.

Monster/Prom!blems

1.) The primary character of my problem is myself. The issue at hand is one that is entirely internal, it relates to how I choose to act and react to various events on a daily basis. The setting of the problem is wherever I am at a particular time, right now the setting happens to be UCSC.

2.) Achebe's grand monster is Imperialism and the restlessness of man's hungry heart. This problem is created by man's constant drive for power and recongnition, as well as the inherent greedy and corruptable nature of those with power. Achebe's monster is created by belief systems ingrained in people's minds, the concept of "the white man's burden" is an example of justification for the destruction of many cultures. The colonists bring a new idealogy and religion with the pre-concieved notion that it is somehow better and more virtuous than any other system that could be in place. Achebe's novel is full of looming dread and the hovering idea of social divsion amongst the African people, which leads to the loss of cultural heritage. Achebe's savage, unlike Rousseau's creature, is an organized group with many bonds and connections to certain things and ideas. They are not in a slow moving dormancy period, but rather in a state of conquest.

Character/setting

Hmmm. Well neither of these are easy to anwser. The most obvious character is myself, being this is about me. As my problem would be me thinking but rarely acting, pretty much anyone I've ever met could be and is a character in this. I suppose I'll actually make this into mainly myself and aspects of myself (perhaps make them into seperate entities in and of themselves?). As for settings... perhaps places inside my mind, or places that I thought but didn't act around people I might include. Still open and plenty of room for thought...ahahaha

my problem/achebe's monster

1. The setting of my problem is the entire world. Global warming effects the entire globe, no one can escape from it, it's happening everywhere. The characters of my problem are every person who lives on this planet. Everyone has a responsiblity to this earth and should be taking care of it, instead of ruining it.

2a. I believe the monster in Achebe is the imperialist who come to Africa to take control. Then strip the villages of culture by trying to convert everyone to their religion. These people only care about themselves and getting what they want, they don't care that they have upset entire villages and destroyed the lives of the natives.

2b. Rousseau's "savage" and Achebe's "savage" are not the same because Achebe's lived together in communities while Rousseau's lived alone with no companions. Achebe's savage also had much more understanding of emotions and feelings while Rousseau's did not.

My Problem / Achebe's Monster / Etc.

1. the characters of my problem are very limited, in fact, its pretty much only me. the setting of it is the present day in my own life. it doesnt concern anyone else or the world around me, its just based around me and my limitations.

2. Achebe's monster appears to be made up of a couple of things. firat of all there are parts of it that are the white man, who has come and upset his villages way of life through exploitation and religious conversion. another part of his mosters seems like it comes from his lazy and generally embaressing father, Achebe is trying to be the opposite of his deadbeat father, and this makes him somewhat too willing to actually do things that are asked / expected of him (ex: the killings).

2a. Rousseaus savage is similarly primitive, however Achebes was more educated and there also seemed to be a good ammount more violence. Similar, but not identical.

My Problem & Achebe's Monster

1 - I am the only character in my problem. My personal pursuit of happiness has created this issue that I hope one day to solve. Whether this is possible I do not know however the outcome shall be down entirely to me.

2 - I see the monster in Achebe as change. The inhabitants of this native African village have lived for thousands of years in a barley-changing continuum. They enjoy their life despite its various pitfalls and are content with who they have become. The first monstrous change is experienced when Okonkwo and is family are forced into exile. This ruins their prosperous life and forces Okonkwo into a depressed state of mind. The next major blow comes with the introduction if white men and their foreign religion. You could see the religion as the monster however I think you need to look at the bigger picture. The religion itself isn't bad because it is much loved in the land of its origin. It is the change from one set of beliefs to another that causes trauma.

Players in the worlds problems/ Achebay monster/ Reussaues savage in Achebays

1)I Would say that the major charicters in the worlds problems today, would be the US, China, and India. The US represents the declining old world, where as the banner of the new world that is on the rise is held by the Chinees, and Indians. The Interaction between the charcters over the next 20 will determin, the funter of the entire world.

2/3) Achebays monster is the white man, and the "progress" that he brings to these simple people, who were living as close to Reussaues ideal of the savage a man can get in the modern world. They were not a solitary people as Reusseau desscribed his savage, but their society was basic enough that many of the detremental trappings and vestages of more and advanced society were not their to corrupt it.

Savage

Since my problem is theological, a higher being must be included for there to be a possible solution. As to the location, it can be anywhere but lies mainly in my mind. There are no physical characters besides myself and does not take place outside of my brain.

After reading about Achebe's life, I found that he did not write the book in his native tongue to later be translated. He wrote it in the tongue of the white man for a specific reason: to teach the whites who the true monsters of uncharted territory are. The white men prove to be the savages and the mosnters, invading the land and forcing their religion upon the indeginious peoples without thinking of the consequences of their actions. Rousseau's savage is uncivilized and, for the most part, extrememly primitive, but contrasts to the proper and educated white monsters of Achebe's work.

Problem/Achebe's Monster

So, i was supposed to have a problem and i couldnt decide on what i wanted to work on about myself. So, i decided on the problem of love. How people fall in love, how people fall out of love, what to do about it and how to contol it, extremeley interests me. So in this problem, my charactors are, myself, Jenny, who is my current girlfrien, and Lauren, who is my ex-girlfriend. The setting is, I used to live at home and that is where my ex-gf lives, she goes to UCLA. Jenny lives next door to me here at UCSC. So my problem is here, home, and at UCLA.

Achebe's monster has to be the colonial powers of England, France, and other european powers. They came into Africa and within a few years they carved it up and had control over a group of people that most people in Europe had never heard of. These Europeans came for the cheap goods and labor these "primitive" africans had to offer. This more than likely would have been looked at as a monsterous act, to come in and declare yourself as the ruler and declare that they all had to pay you and work for you, or they are killed.

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Isaac- Achebe's Monster & Characters

I think the characters of my problem are figures I beleive to represent the dichotomy of my potential life choices. On one hand are those I beleive to be fighters- a variety of occupations including serial killers, anarchist insurgents, rockstars, pirates, and mad scientists and on the other are those I believe to be those who make peace such as yogis, shamans, and possibly astronauts. I think God is a character in my problem. Also the doomsday device from Dr. Strangelove.
I think my problem takes place in space and time on a rock orbiting a star in a galaxy somewhere.

I think Achebe's monster is that which pilages and rapes someone's cultural identity. This monster is created my man's intrinsic ego and desire to affluence everyone else with his own special ideas while in turn completely disregarding people's existing thoughts and notions about the world.
Rouseau's "savage" does not necessarily reflect what Achebe describes but our want or need to know that a utopian means of life existed once before. As we saw in the village of Umuofia, war and hardship were well understood fundamental parts of life. They are not our new inventions; we have merely upgraded their components.

Thursday, January 18, 2007

posting for Patrick Chu

this is a post for Patrick, whose blogger is being disblogginating:

It seems as if Rousseau in his analysis involving state of nature perceives man as a medium that can be molded into a violent being, yet is not necessarily violent by bare nature. The seemingly idealistic man lives in harmony and can maintain natural goodness on his own. Unfortunately, the violence attributed to mankind that can be found deeply-rooted within society can be enough to corrupt the pure nature of man. Mary Shelly's Frankenstein confirms Rousseau's notion with the monster's initial desire for only self preservation, personal fulfillment, and happiness as well as his complete ignorance(bliss) from the violent and scarring traits of society that are soon branded upon his character or nature. It isn't until after the monster experiences the horrible nature of society in a way to make him perceive the world around him as a threatening place that he begins to take part in actions that would deem him a "monster" in the eyes of our civilization such as murder of other humans. Rousseau is supported by Shelly in the sense that the monster, from the moment of its conception, seeks nothing more than to live happily without the agony of rejection and solitude that his encounters with society have made him aware of. Though Hobbes presents an interesting argument in the concept that men are born with violent properties ingrained within their nature and that they exist without regard for other humans, I truly believe that Shelly's monsters violent actions directly resulted from society's impact on the way he thought and acted rather than his own initial "violent state of nature".


A problem that faces me as of recently is my uncertainty with what I want to do with my life. I know, I know, "that's a real original problem Patrick, way to be boring!" Yet it's the truth. As of now, I truly want to pursue playing music as a career yet it seems to have a reputation for having an unpleasantly high failure to success ratio. I really do think from the bottom of my heart that my band has what it takes to get somewhere, and if that requires me possibly postponing my education in the future to tour and all that jazz, is it worth the risk to take the step towards what I see myself most happy with?

setting/characters of my problem and achebe's monster

The setting of my problem is present day, throughout the whole world, but certainly in the United States. The characters of my problem are pretty much everybody, except, of course, for a select few humanitarians and activists who have genuinely and continuously made an effort to fix some of the many problems in the world. The characters of my problem are every person that has at one point felt apathetic to all of these global issues (which, of course, is pretty much everyone).

Achebe’s monster, from what I gather, is the monster that Okonkwo became in order to make sure he did not end up like his father. Because his father was such a disappointment to him, Okonkwo took every characteristic of his father and made sure he was the exact opposite, which ended up serving as his downfall because while his father was lazy and somewhat weak, he was also caring and gentle. Although Rousseau’s “savage” was not nearly as violent as Achebe’s was, they are similar in the respect that neither are capable of emotion or love.

Mary Shelley and some Issues

(Simply because I believe it repetative to create yet another post entitled My Problem or Frankenstein/Rousseau.)

To say that Frankenstein's creation is a representative of Rousseau's natural man is both intelligent and unreasonable. At first the monster seems to be a peaceful, observatory creature, more interested in studying the civilization than anything else. This is very well aligned with Rousseau's idea of the natural man. He exists on his own, without interaction with others. Later in the story, too, the creature shows himself as Rousseau's natural man, when he asks for a female companion, and speaks about how nuts and berries are enough food to satisfy him. He does not, however, reflect Rousseau's thinking when he revels in the kill of his first victim, and in every subsequent victim. Rousseau would say that these actions and urges were thrust upon his character by the presence of the society around him. It could be argued, however, that in some way these actions were done only to get what he wanted, in which case they are incredibly infantile. If this is the case, the unbridled action upon instinct also agrees with Rousseau's idea of the natural man.



The thing most plaguing to me at the moment is the complete lack of stability in any and every human life (particularly my own). Every day we live, every action we take, every thing we say, all alter the way our next daay will be lived. And subsequently, there is no thing (tangible or otherwise) in our lives that will remain constant. Everything will eventually change. When each of us is done with our education, we must attempt to support ourselves in some way. Whether it be by working, thieving, manipulating, or what have you, this, then will change. Along the way the people we stay in contact with will fluctuate. Our pets will change, be it number, kind, gender, age, health, or existence. Our points of view of the world will also be altered in this process. All throughout our lives we will be worried about what threat the next shift will bring, be it poverty, poor health, or poor company. When we reach a certain point, everything once again shifts, as we become supported by our government, our significant others, our children, or whatever. Our daily routines will change again. And then, just as we become comfortable with ourselves, and our lives, something tragic happens, and we are handicapped, bedridden, severely injured, or even killed.
I suppose what I'm trying to say in all this is that I would like to have some any one thing that I know will be constant for the rest of my life. I'm not talking about nothing ever changing. I just want one something I know I can count on.

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

My problem,Rousseau,Hobbes

The problem that faces me would be making it through college and not letting the problems in my life and society affect me. I worry too much about the future like how am I going to pay my college,what do I really want to do with my life,who am I and what do I want to be? In Rousseau's I believe that his main point was that everyone is born innocent, but society corrupts or makes people go through the wrong path.I believe that this is true becuase when the creature was made he did not show any signs of violence or wickedness untill he was pushed to the limits by people.Hobbes believes that it is better to be alone ,but in Frankienstien the creature does not want to be alone and wants a companion.

creative project

I would have to say that a problem that currently faces me would be what I really want my career to be. I know what areas I am interested in and what areas I'm not, however, actually deciding on a career that I will be happy in is hard to figure out. I know that I am only in my freshman year in college, but it feels like time goes by so quickly and I will soon need to figure it out. It feels as though when you think you have an idea of which direction you are headed, there is something in your life that makes you think differently. I guess I need to really take a good look to discover which job I would be most happy in.

Rousseau/Hobbes

Frankenstein proves, to certain extents, both Rousseau's "State of Nature" and Hobbes' "State of War," (although realistically, if you pay attention to only certain details of any text, it'll prove you pretty much anything). Rousseau's main idea was that everyone is born as a pure, innocent human being, it is exposure to the evils of society that makes people change for the worse. This is definitely shown in Frankenstein as the monster is brought to life, and then learns from and responds to everyone's reaction to him. He was embittered by his creator's horrified reaction and the villagers' violent one, and only through learning that there was violence in the world and having it directed at him did he himself become violent. Hobbes' theory that man is unsociable and should live solitarily can be argued either way, but when thought about with the idea that the monster shouldn't have been brought to life in the first place, and that all he got out of life was trouble and despair, it does to an extent give the impression that humans would be saved a lot of heartbreak and unhappiness if they lived alone. On the other hand, the only thing the monster really longs for is a real companion to keep him company, which in the end is what most people want.

problems

I guess the biggest problem i face is that i never face my problems. I can obsess about whatever issue at hand endlessly, yet when time comes to look squarely at it, I prefer to deal with smaller, trivial problems first, such as the tidiness of my room (can always get tidier) or the welfare of my pet rat (can always be happier). Take for example, the past hour. Current problem: blog entry about problems. Solution: Write two sentences, go do laundry, talk to friend for half an hour, put on music, feed said pet rat, talk to best friend in Davis on telephone. My current favorite problem is that I want to have a creative outlet, but I lack the courage to find out if I'm actually any good at any type of media, because I'm afraid of the probable probability that I'll just come up with total crap. This will make doing this assignment rather interesting, because the creative assignment will literally be my problem.

My problem plus Frankenstein/Rousseau

My problem is that I fail to take the initiative when it comes to many aspects of my life. For instance I have a severe procrastination problem when it comes to my schoolwork. I know the benefits of starting things early but I can’t seem to bring myself to actually follow through with making the change in my behavior.


“The Monster” begins his existence in utter confusion until he discovers the joys of learning. He rapidly gains literacy and begins consuming all sorts of ideas from various books. He develops a very romantic viewpoint of our world and longs for the love and companionship that he observes from the shadows. After his bold attempts to join the world of men he is rejected, due to his appearance, which ultimately corrupts him. His transformation from a kind gentle creature to an angry, vengeful monster supports one of Rousseau’s main arguments. This would be that men are born as good beings and it is when they are exposed to society and its ills that they change for the worse.

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Frankenstein & Rousseau

I would say that its fairly obvious that in some ways Frankenstein by Mary Shelley does confirm Rousseau's ideas of the state of nature. The monster is created and is initally not violent or hateful, but after being treated that way by society the monster becomes violent. The monster is corrupted by society, turned evil....yeah, society sucks with a capitol X. SuX.

-Nick Golden

My Very Own Problem

I have a little problem. it is my own special problem that i have all to myself. Everyone has problems, but this one is no ordinary problem, because its mine. Sometimes just thinking about it is enough to throw me back to that deep, dark place; a place that i dont want to be. its hard, living day to day life with a problem like this, but somehow i manage to pull myself togeather just enough each day to make it to the next. im not sure what can be done about it, but from what ive been told its not something that is fixable. perhaps someday there will be a parade to support people with my problem, but for now i will have to bare it alone. my problem: i can never finish anything (especially creative things) that i start.

- Nick Golden

Confrontational Problematic Syndrome

I suppose that my life is filled with a variety of problems, as are the lives of most of us on this earth, but on the brighter side, my life's also filled with solutions to the problems. Sometimes there aren't any solutions, or I just can't seem to find them, or even that one. My biggest problem, which divinely lacks a solution, would have to be the fact that I never really know "what it is I want" or what I'm shooting for (definitely long term career goals?). Who really knows. I suppose that my problem is a common ground for many college students, like myself, but damn it, it's not an easy one to approach. The more things I am exposed to here at school, or in life, this life as a student, the more that "what it is I want" seems to change and find new direction. It's not a bad thing, really. Gaining new interest in new things is nice, and being able to do so, is something I consider a privilege. However, falling in love with all sorts of new stuff inevitably adds to the pile of things that I want to do, or be, or become. Which leaves me with the same, however much deeper question of, "What is it that I want?"

My "problem"

The problem that has the most affect on me is my inability to make a decision or make one in time. Throughout my life, it was my parents and mostly my sister that would decided everything for me. Because of that I never had much opinion on anything. I fear that if I make any decision, they would be the wrong ones and I would just feel horrible about it. I made my own decisions before but they ended badly and I couldn't take the consequences and since then, I rely on my sister a lot to help me out.

Elizabeth

Rousseau/Frankenstein

Rousseau had said that society made man evil and I think it does relate to Frankenstein. In the monster's point of view, people rejected him because he was hideous looking. Since society had treated him badly, he reacted to things badly. Throughout the book, the monster did do bad things like killing Victor's wife, friend and brother. However, he wanted to be accepted but sadly not.

Elizabeth

Frankenstien/Rousseau

Rousseau believes in the inherent good in men, and that humans are kind creatures. Rousseau's idea that society creates evil in men, and that only when violence and anger are shown to a man, can he retaliate that act, is partially in Frankenstien. Frankenstien's monster was only shown anger and violence so that was all he knew. The monster was not inherently evil, he had certain primitive thoughts and acted on them in the only way he understood. Rousseau's idea that men are born good and society turns them evil is exemplified to an extent in Frankenstien.

Rousseau and Shelley's state of nature

I think that Rousseau's state of nature is only partially confirmed by Frankenstein. Rousseau believes that men are born good and gentle, and that it is in their nature to be kind. He then blames society for causing the evil that corrupts men into no longer doing good deeds, but being violent and cruel to eachother. Frankenstein's monster is very similar to this, only after he is shunned by his creator and society does he become violent and aspire to hurt. On the other hand, William was only a young child when he ran into the creature, and he insulted it and was hostile; hinting that humans can also be born with evil as well as good.

Problem

I have a problem but there is no solution. So i will tell about that one and then offer a problem that may actually have a solution. My first problem is that i am in love. I met my ex-gf at home a few years ago, we dated and then she moved to LA to go to UCLA (she's a year older). We kept it together for a while but it slowly got harder. Then we pulled it together for this summer and then couldn't hold it when the school year started. She's 400 some-odd miles away and i never get to see her enough to make her happy. So, Im in love, but i can't be close to her for at least 4 years. Ill work on a solution.
Ok, problem with a solution, potentially. I always procrastinate, and whenever I need to get something done my room gets filled and i have to leave to get anything done. So sometimes, I dont leave. I just have to be better at time management, and setting time to work and actually working in that time.

The readings

In the reading of Rousseau, the idea that property in a man's life is perceived to be important, and that both property and wealth, not only defines a man's nature but also creates the society in which man must dwell in, can be argued both ways. Many might argue that property is not something which can shape or define a man's nature. Shelley writes of love and the relationships between people to be more important than anything else, even property and wealth. As found in her writings, the monster is only concerned with finding himself a lover and having human affection and acceptance. His whole existence is just wanted to be accepted for WHO he is, not WHAT he is.In the writings of Hobbes, man is unsociable; that is to say man is unable get along with one another. One idea is that man should live a solitary life. As one can infer from Shelley, she disagrees with Hobbes simply because she believes man needs some type of relationship to able to define himself first as being man and then being able separate himself from the rest, such as animals and plants. Both of these ideals can be found in Shelley's writings, but it is hard to say which one makes its presence more known.

No Problems..........Right ^_-

NOT Being aware of the most obvious things around me is my problem. I never notice anything and the things that I do notice tend to be unimportant. I really wish I could notice the obvious. Maybe its cuz I don’t have common sense.....or maybe the things that I think are so obvious may not be not so obvious after all. But what do I know, I’m just a lost lost guy. I really don’t know how to elaborate on this, I just know that my problem is this and I want to fix.


Think of it as such:

You are sitting on a simple chair. Nothing special about it, just a chair. Then out of no where, a little red light turns on, but 2 seconds later, a green light turns on. Then after about 30 seconds, you realize you are sitting behind the wheel of giant 18 wheeler.


Kinda scary huh? ^ _^

Rousseau, Hobbes, and Shelley

1. Rousseau believes that property is the most important thing that man can obtain throughout his life, and that property and monetary wealth defines man's nature and society. Shelley on the other hand is a romantic who believes that love and relatioships between people are above all the most important thing man can dedicate himself to, not money or property. The monster, throughout the book, is not concerned with owning his own house and buying the latest fashions. His whole existence is to find himself a mate and have a human connection or interaction; that is the passion that drives him.

2. Hobbes beleives that man is unsociable, cannot get along with each other, and that man should live a solitary life with no company. Shelley disagrees with Hobbes because she believes man needs his relationships to define him as being man and separating us from animals. However, her characters end up following a hobbesian lifestyle, Frankenstein and the monster end up alone, because she is trying to prove that it is the wrong way of living.

problem

My problem that faces me is anticipation. I am a very impatient person, and even though I am living my life, mostly the way I want to, i am waiting for the rest of my life to begin. It's not that I want to surpass all the hard work, its just that i want more to my life then school. I just want more meaning and more purpose.

My problem

My problem is that I have to be interested in and care about what I'm doing in order to do a good job and not save it for the last minute. For example, if I get an essay assignment that isn't interesting to me, I put it off until the last minute and don't do as a good a job as a I could have. Obviously this is a problem, because there are always things that you don't want to do that you have to anyway. Its made me wonder what I can do to get interested in the mandatory assignments in my life, as well as wonder what to do with my life when I graduate from college--because having a job I love and can actually enjoy and be good at is essential to me.

All At Once

This is my first time, both to blogging in general and to blogging for this class. I hate the word blog. And blogging. Bad news bears.
Q1: The thing I hate most about my home is . . . hard to pinpoint. I love my home, it's beautiful, well situated between city, mountains, and beach, the people are nice, and most are progressive thinkers. I don't like the near constant fog and rain of winter (which is not the case this year, I do honestly think it's because of global warming . . .). I despise the yuppie-ville feel that excessive wealth of my fellow inhabitants creates. I also abhor the unnecessary tendency of my peers to get fucked up. And not just fucked up, in my home town one doesn't smoke three bowls, take ten shots, and say "I'm FUCKED up, man." No, no. They take two mescaline and some X, maybe a 1/4 of shrooms and some acid too. Then they smoke and drink. I'm exaggerating, sorry. They're not that intense, but they are intense and I don't like it. I can feel the gaping holes they're burning in their brains and it hurts me.
Q2: What problem faces me? I've spent a lot of time on this one. A lot of problems face me, and I'm not talking about personal problems, those are not as important to me as the problems that face the world. Whoa, I that was a lie. Of course my personal problems are more important, that's why I buy clothes made in China. I mean to say that for this project what is more interesting to adress are world problems. And a lot of the issues that face the world (and me, in smaller ways) come, I think, from greed. So my problem is greed. Whether innate or created, big or small, I want to know where it comes from, what it does, how it does it, why it does it, and maybe, just maybe, how to stop it.
Q3: I think Mary Shelley's Frankenstein confirms Rousseau's state of nature if you consider her monster to be a man, which, for the sake of this blog, we will (which does not mean that I think he is a man). In part one of the Second Discourse Rousseau describes natural man's development from a savage who's actions and thoughts are little different from an animal to the more developed actions of social man, actions that require forethought and knowledge. Shelley's monster goes through the stages described by Rousseau, just at a much more rapid pace. The "wretch" is a timid, peaceful sort in the beginning. However, when the monster kills Frankenstein's brother he is no longer in accordance with Rousseau's state of nature. Rousseau believed that man in his natural state would be "without any desire of hurting [his fellows]" (pg.110-111). Rousseau thinks that property and inequality are needed to arouse enough anger to incite wo/man to violence. The monster has no property when he kills the boy. So I think that this sudden violence is more in line with Hobbes' state of war. It was not, however, self preservation that caused the monster to kill. Indeed it was simply for comfort (to stop the boy's yelling) that he murdered. This is in accordance with Rousseau's view of Hobbes' state of war: that Hobbes took social/sophisticated man and put him in a world without government, without social conventions and that this is what caused their brutality. Natural man does not understand comforts, nor language. His first reaction to discomfort would be to flee. But the monster doesn't flee, he talks to the boy (language is a trapping of social man), and then attacks the boy to create a situation that he finds more desirable: silence. This is what a Rousseau's idea of a sophisticated man would do in Hobbes state of war.
So both the idea's fit, but Rousseau's is the one that is vindicated to a fuller extent. Ha.

Society

One thing I would like to mention:

The true monster of Mary Shelley's work is not the hideous, deformed giant with an even bigger personality disorder, but Victor Frankenstein. Initially, the creature was gentle and intuitive, ready to experience life and all the wonders of the world, but he was abandoned by his creator, Victor. The man who played God did not take responsibility for his actions, he did not kill the creature as it took its first breath, he did not accept the creature as a living thing, he instead ran away in horror and brought despair upon his family. He was insane and paranoid and not nearly as eloquent as the creature, making him, in my eyes, the true monster of the novel. The triviality of the humans and of Victor make the creature the victim, not the terrorizing hellion most see him as.

Rousseau wrote that men are born inherently good and that society forms them into either good or evil. Men are merely the molds into which society poors its influences and ideas, whether good or bad. The creature of Mary Shelley's work is born neither good nor bad, but neutral, and is formed into the "monster" society views him as due to the beatings and from being ostracized. Since he has been influenced by these acts, he sees them as common and right. Hobbes, on the other hand, writes that man is born evil and knows only evil and must overcome this as life progresses. This view can be easily supported, I believe, simply by looking at the modern world and its many discontents, including tyrants, terrorism, and tight fisted millionaires. I believe men are born neutral and are a completely blank slate with no influences before he enters the world.

I had a difficult time thinking of a specific problem as there are numerous problems in the world today that directly affect me and will affect my future children, but I decided to take a step back from global issues and find an issue within myself. I am an atheist. I do not believe in God, in heaven, in reincarnation, in an afterlife, in even a higher power. But I want to. I want to have something to hold onto, to believe in, to belong to; I want above all to be included in something bigger than my problems or global problems. My problem is that I do not believe, that I cannot believe, but that I desperately want to.

problemathematics

I live in a city which saw 148 people murdered this past year, 135 of them shot, as near as investigators can tell, for simply standing on a street corner. I live in a city 50% of whose youth won't graduate high school, and an equal number of whom are depressed and believe tomorrow is likely to be worse than today. It's hard not to see these problems as interelated, it's equally hard to see the interelations clearly. At the very same time, I live here in comfort and relative ease and enjoy and truly love this city. Somewhere in the conflict between these two states (these two cities) lies the problem I am going to try to address.

I've done a lot of writing about Oakland in the abstract, for lack of a better term, and in ways that manage to sidestep my place here. I feel like the challenge now is to write (or draw or sing, etc) about its contemporary situation as well as where I fit into its scheme.

(p.s. you probably won't hear from me again on this until the end of the quarter, but be assured that I'm doing every step of the project along with you)

Rousseau & Frankenstein

Rousseau believes that man isn't born evil or corrupt, that over time society has made mankind as a whole, corrupt. He believes that men were originally born good, and that good was indeed their true nature. But then society got in the way. People began to feel the need for some to be seen as "better" as a way of organizing. i am able to draw many connections between ideas in Rousseau to ideas in Frankenstein. When the monster was created, he felt no need to seek power or hurt others. he simply wanted love or at least companionship. but when he goes into society, looking the way he does, he is immediatly attacked. his first interaction with people is a beating. if the monster did not look the way he did, and if society didn't value appearance so much. then the monster would not have been treated that way and could have potentially turned out good.

Rousseau & Frankenstein

Rousseau believes that man isn't born evil or corrupt, that over time society has made mankind as a whole, corrupt. He believes that men were originally born good, and that good was indeed their true nature. But then society got in the way. People began to feel the need for some to be seen as "better" as a way of organizing. i am able to draw many connections between ideas in Rousseau to ideas in Frankenstein. When the monster was created, he felt no need to seek power or hurt others. he simply wanted love or at least companionship. but when he goes into society, looking the way he does, he is immediatly attacked. his first interaction with people is a beating. if the monster did not look the way he did, and if society didn't value appearance so much. then the monster would not have been treated that way and could have potentially turned out good.

the problem i face

I have experienced pain at a young age. Since then I have promised myslef to never to hurt anyone, to defend those who needed it, and to always do the right thing. Even if the right path is the harder path. But as i get older, in a world where kindness and justice aren't always valued, i find this goal harder and harder to meet. As i grow, i meet various problematic people and events and i can't help but become more cynical and find my efforts pointless. i try and remind myself that i don't do what is right for the rewards. i do what is right for that very reason. simply because it is the right thing to do, not for recognition. Fighting to be good in a society where kindness is seen as weakness, is my problem.