In class work

Group #4

First thing, to be fair to all the people in this group I have place “**” and “*” next to some of the writing. The person who has the “**” symbol next to their writing didn’t try and do the class work. The person who wrote the passage with the “*” did exactly as instructed and wrote in opposition to the writing before it.

-First thoughts-
"I believe that the quotes agree with each other. Just because of how someone is labeled, that makes them either good or bad - equal or unequal."
-Opposition-
"The two quotes disagree because the first quote the poses the question if opposites are equal or is one better? At the end of the first it states that the question should not be answered by slaves and their masters but between free truth seeking people. To me it seems like the first question is seeking an answer of "No". The second quote seems to answer the first quote but it is saying "Yes"."

-First thoughts-
"They disagree. The first one asks if rich/in charge/powerful are better than poor/obedient/weak. At the end of the first quote it states not to compare with slaves and masters but with free truth seeking men. The second one says that noble/aristocratic are better than common/plebian. It seems to me that the second does the opposite of that was intended."
-Opposition-
“I think they agree. They are both saying that just because the way people are labeled makes them either "good" or "bad" - equal or unequal. Both agree that "good" is associated with rich and aristocratic and "bad" is associated with poor and slaves."

-First thoughts-
"Both quotes speak of inequality in society between the wealthy and the poor, and both question whether or not those of the aristocracy are truly "better" than those of the lowest class. They both bring up that people naturally associate "good: and "virtue" with the rich, while "bad" and "low" are associated with the poor. So, based on these similarities, say the quotes agree/connect with each other."
-Opposition-
**"that looks like it makes a lot of sense, and any way I wouldn't really care if we got rid of every class, cos they take waaay to much work."

-First thoughts-
**"The quotes all seem to be in agreement with each other except for the one about Neiche in the bathtub rolling cigarettes with his tongue, I thought Marx might have a little trouble with that statement, on the foundation that is a bit overdramatic. And I think he might have wanted some Cubans to dance at his party any way, cos the Russians can't really hold their liquor. The biggest problem with Things Fall Apart, is that Rambo couldn't pull it together with horses stampeding through his dreams.
On a more serious not, Okonkwo was not well known throughout the nine villages, he wasn't famous."
-Opposition-
*"I think that the one about Nietzsche in the bathtub wasn't overdramatic at all. If anything, it was mark dramatic. Furthermore, Russians invented vodka, so they can obviously hold their liquor. And, lastly, Rambo can always pull it together. Always."